When we encounter the book of Kohelet(Ecclesiastes), we encounter an author in crisis. Kohelet son of David is unable to see any meaning in life. What is the nature of this personal crisis? How has the King come to this bleak outlook? Let's approach Kohelet through the lens of modern Tanach study and Psychoanalytic theory and see if we can gain some insight into these questions.
Contradictory Voices
Our sages found the book of Kohelet(Ecclesiastes) to be problematic, and considered omitting it from the Tanach, as the Gemara relates:
Rav Yehuda, son of Rav Shmuel bar Sheilat, said in the name of Rav: The Sages sought to suppress the book of Ecclesiastes (and declare it apocryphal) because its statements contradict one other. And why did they not suppress it? Because its beginning consists of matters of Torah and its end consists of matters of Torah.(Shabbat 30b).
How are we to understand the many internal contradictions in this book and what do they mean?
Yoel Bin-Nun and Yaakov Meidan present a novel approach to this question in their book
"Ani Kohelet"(pub. 2017). The theory is that the book of Kohelet is a dialectic between four different "Personalities", from within the head of a single author:
- Practical Personality- a man of action and achievement
- Hedonic Personality- out to enjoy all life has to offer
- Wise Personality- a master of wisdom
- Pious Personality- Godfearing man
This theory of different sub-personalities also explains the name of the book's mysterious author:
"The words of Kohelet son of David, king in Jerusalem."
Who is this Kohelet son of David who is mentioned nowhere else in Tanach? Our sages identify him as King Shlomo, but why the pseudonym?
Bin-Nun and Meidan read the name Kohelet as rooted in "Makhelah"--the Hebrew word for a "Choir". Shlomo refers to himself by this name as a reference to the choir of different voices in his head who engage in this poetic dialog. From this perspective, the Book of Kohelet reads almost like a Greek Play, performed by distinct characters, each singing their parts in dialog with one another.
Shlomo chooses to use a pseudonym due to the deeply personal nature of sharing his inner conflict.
Psychosynthesis
According to Bin-Nun and Meidan, the book of Kohelet records the conflict between the many sub-personalities in King Shlomo head. This literary theory reflects a popular psychanalytical model of personality.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEimGcJuBRoNlGT1q_kdFIIMMliXbtJDGWTXPXe7L-9uNy8O-wtHjYig80_28K17ERxl_bR6C4SJMn-l1zlAkXHpbAuLLcYxfLYMvUkqUmekeCq6nN_kXOvdG8U6S49ijFAbrURg-SJvoAfX6041zS5TgwUqY43WCVqUh1tio9cP__lPC0WL8bg8CARDMaQ) |
Freud and Jung |
Psychoanalysts like Freud and Jung developed the idea that Human personality can be understood as as an amalgam of various sub-personalities. A person strives to integrate these personalities and reach a state of equilibrium between them.
Jordan Peterson points out that, as challenges are encountered, the sub-personalities clash and each one "tries to make their case". As such, these sub-personalities are most apparent at times of crisis. This process of Psychosynthesis is actually adaptive and looks something like this:
- Equilibrium- subject has a well-integrated personality
- Crisis- breaks the equilibrium. One of the subject's sub-personalities has an extreme reaction to the crisis
- Psychosynthesis- Subject thinks obsessively about the crisis, how he failed to anticipate it, how he failed in handling it, what he should do about it moving forward. Each sub-personality has a take and they argue with one another whose approach is correct. This can take days, weeks, months, or even years as the subject subconsciously seeks a satisfactory solution
- Re-Integration- subject has "solved" the situation and now has an approach for dealing with it in the future. A new equilibrium has been reached and they have grown as a person.
King Shlomo's Crisis
This model of Crisis, Psychosynthesis, and Reintegration fits well with the description of Kohelet as a dialog between sub-personalities who reach a resolution in the end. That said, one cannot help but wonder what was the crisis that triggered the whole process. No external danger is mentioned, so it seems that we are dealing with an Existential Crisis.
Existential Crisis- in existentialism, a crucial stage or turning point at which an individual is faced with finding meaning and purpose in life and taking responsibility for their choices(from American Psychological Association Dictionary of Psychology)
I would speculate that Shlomo finds himself in a whopping Midlife Crisis. He has been incredibly successful: ruling over a stable kingdom, building God's temple, amassing a personal fortune, and having fathered numerous children with his many wives. At this point, the incredibly ambitious Shlomo looks forward to his next achievement and finds... nothing of significance. He has been spectacularly successful, but has already accomplished all of his greatest achievements. Looking forward, Shlomo sees only lesser goals and his own mortality looming.
Looking at the
Structure of Kohelet, in the first half of the book Shlomo finds himself pulled in four different directions:
- Practical Personality- pulls him to gather more riches and build more palaces and gardens
- Hedonic Personality- pulls him to enjoy his remaining days in luxury
- The Wise Personality- pulls him to prefer a life of scholarship over a material life
- Pious Personality- pulls him to live piously as a humble servant of God
Shlomo recognizes the value of each of these approaches, each "In it's own season", but ultimately chooses Wisdom and Piety as the focus for his latter days. This will make a worthy legacy as a son of David and King of Jerusalem. At this point he has integrated his sub-personalities, grown as a person, and the crisis is resolved.